Born in Elgin, Illinois, Shales labored as an editor at The Washington Examiner earlier than getting employed as a author for The Washington Publish‘s Fashion desk in 1972. 5 years later, he was named TV critic. His default voice was that of a skeptical midwestern curmudgeon who may very well be roused to righteous ire when confronted with a program he discovered creatively lackluster or morally repulsive.
Panning the 1987 miniseries “Napoleon and Josephine,” Shales wrote that costar Anthony Perkins’ eyes had been “perpetually popped open by way of the entire thing, as if Mama Bates has simply rushed out of the fruit cellar together with her butcher knife once more.” He referred to as late night time host Jimmy Kimmel “”a dwelling monotone in most conceivable senses of the phrase,” dismissed the whole lot of Comedy Central as “a pantingly determined cable community,” and was one among a handful of TV critics to usually dislike “Seinfeld,” for what he noticed as its gratuitous coldness and meanness, its reliance on ethnic stereotypes, and self-loathing perspective in direction of Judaism. “What ‘Seinfeld’ has helped unfold by way of community tv is darkness, that seemingly most beneficial of up to date qualities, the factor that some refined viewers discover a redeeming high quality for in any other case undistinguished pop,” he wrote in a chunk that ran upfront of the collection finale, including that he thought of Seinfeld himself “a tremendously uninteresting, empty-headed man for somebody who makes his dwelling by his wits.” At Nationwide Public Radio, the place Shales delivered on-air opinions of films for 20 years, he coined a memorable phrase to explain the over-scaled, more and more digitized motion in superhero films: “big issues crashing into different big issues.” (He was reviewing 1997’s “Batman and Robin.”)
However Shales may very well be beneficiant, even ecstatic, when he got here throughout a TV program or film that he thought had been made with intelligence, care, and a way of showmanship. He praised “Twin Peaks,” “The Sopranos,” “NYPD Blue,” “The Wire,” “Cheers” and lots of different collection that at the moment are thought of everlasting fixtures within the pantheon, in addition to some outliers that he thought ought to have been extra well known for his or her excellence, reminiscent of “Chilly Case,” “Thriller Science Theater 3000,” and “Scrubs.” In 1977, Shales reviewed a then-new film referred to as “Star Wars” for Nationwide Public Radio and referred to as it “… casually profound. In an environment of seemingly groundless escapism, it worships the air we cling in. With out ever stopping for a breath, a lot much less the making of an announcement, ‘Star Wars’ celebrates that portion of the human mind that’s shared by the good and the silly.” He referred to as “Jurassic Park” “the best monster film since ‘King Kong'” and praised it as “a technological triumph about expertise run amok.”
Shales carried the historical past of two mediums round in his head, and will entry them in an idiosyncratic, private, pre-Web model—one that made it clear that he actually knew what he was speaking about, and had precise books in his possession, and wasn’t simply Googling titles and grabbing the primary factoids that popped up. In one of many final massive items Shales wrote earlier than stepping down from the Publish in 2010, a consideration of “Dancing with the Stars,” “America’s Bought Expertise” and different performance-driven competitors reveals, Shales gave readers a thumbnail historical past and evaluation of the significance of music within the early years of TV, citing not simply “The Ed Sullivan Present” and “Hollywood Palace” however “Ted Mack’s Unique Newbie Hour” and “Arthur Godfrey’s Expertise Scouts.” Writing on the singularly odd vitality of speak present host Tom Snyder—a hero of David Letterman—Shales wrote, “The Snyder we noticed on TV was not a reproduction of the true man; it was the true man.”